Protest that agency misevaluated similarity of awardee's experience to solicited work by considering only dollar value of prior contracts, rather than specific elements of similarity-such as contract type and complexity-is denied agency reasonably determined that dollar value reflects several aspects of similarity and record shows that agency also considered offerors' descriptions of work under prior contracts in concluding that awardee's experience was of size, type and complexity similar to that described in solicitation.Ĥ.
Protest that agency improperly failed to credit protester's proposal with claimed strength is denied where protester fails to establish that claimed strength would provide benefit to agency contemplated by evaluation scheme.ģ. Protest that agency's realism analysis of awardee's proposal was inadequate-because it was based on comparison of awardee's average labor rates to incumbent contractor's average rates-is denied agency's chosen methodology was within its discretion given fixed-price nature of contract to be awarded, and thus provided reasonable basis for agency to conclude that awardee's price did not present a performance risk.Ģ. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.ġ. Patent and Trademark Office, for the agency.
King, Esq., Barton, Baker, Thomas & Tolle, LLP, for Evolver, Inc., an intervenor. O'Brien, Esq., Cohen Mohr, LLC, for the protester.
0 kommentar(er)
